-
NLRB Important Changes Discussed on CalNevaLaw Podcast
By SHLC on June 9, 202201Important changes are on the horizon for the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) that would have an enormous impact on union elections in the US. Employers who want to remain union free need to understand these changes and adopt a more proactive approach to educating their workforce. In a podcast posted on CalNevaLaw Podcast posted on April 23, 2022, SHLC […] -
Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc.: California Supreme Court Raises the Stakes for Meal and Rest Period Compliance
On May 23, 2022, after a nearly two-and-a-half year wait, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in the case of Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc. The decision answers a very important question for California employers: May a California employee pursue so-called “paystub penalties” and “waiting time penalties” due to a failure to pay or report meal and/or rest […] -
Federal Ban on Pre-Dispute Arbitration Agreements Covering Sexual Assault or Sexual Harassment Claims Signed by President Biden
On March 3, 2022, President Biden signed H.R. 4445, known as the “Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021.” H.R. 4445 amends the Federal Arbitration Act to bar pre-dispute arbitration agreements of claims alleging sexual assault or sexual harassment, and includes a bar against any waivers of the right to bring such claims jointly and/or […] -
California Employers Must Post the New COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave Workplace Notice
As discussed in our prior blog, Governor Newsom signed SB 114 into law, which requires California employers with 26 or more employees to provide up to 80 hours of supplemental paid sick leave for qualifying COVID-19-related reasons (“2022 SPSL”). Among the requirements of SB 114 is the requirement to post a notice in the workplace or distribute it electronically such […] -
California COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave is Back in 2022 with Different Provisions
On February 9, 2022, Governor Newsom signed SB 114 into law, which requires California employers with 26 or more employees to provide up to 80 hours of supplemental paid sick leave for qualifying COVID-19-related reasons (“2022 SPSL”). The obligation to provide the new paid sick leave begins on February 19, 2022. As before, employers must also provide retroactive pay from January […] -
Recent Nevada Law Places New Restrictions on Non-Compete Agreements
On October 1, 2021, new provisions took effect within NRS 613.195, Nevada’s primary statute governing the enforceability of employee covenants not to compete. The new provisions—that result from the passage of Assembly Bill 47—have changed the legal landscape with respect to non-compete agreements, and have left many employers wondering whether they can continue to use and enforce these agreements with […] -
Podcast: What You Need to Know About AB 51 Mandatory Arbitration Agreements
SHLC attorneys Brett Sutton and Jared Hague talk about the recent developments relating to California’s AB 51 mandatory arbitration agreement law. Listen to the podcast below: You may also read our prior blogs on AB 51 by clicking here -
California Requires Employers to Provide 12 Weeks of Job Protected Leave to Care for a Parent-in-Law
On September 27, 2021, Governor Newsom signed AB 1033 into law to include leave to care for a parent-in-law within the definition of family care and medical leave. Last year, SB 1383 amended and expanded the California Family Rights Act (“CFRA”) to apply to small California businesses. For more information, read our blog on SB 1383 here and listen to […] -
Ninth Circuit Removes Preliminary Injunction, Mostly Upholds California Law Prohibiting Mandatory Employment Arbitration Agreements
On September 15, 2021, in the case of Chamber of Commerce of the U.S., et al. v. Bonta, et al., No. 20-15291 (9th Cir. Sept. 15, 2021) (read the decision here), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a decision regarding the future of California’s AB 51, which regulates employer use of mandatory arbitration agreements. The Ninth […] -
California Supreme Court Rules the Regular Rate of Pay is Proper Method for Calculating Premium Pay for Rest, Recovery and Meal Periods
On June 15, 2021, in Ferra v. Loews Hollywood Hotel, LLC, the California Supreme Court held that the term “regular rate of compensation” means the same as the “regular rate of pay” and not the employee’s base hourly rate. This holding is important for California employers because it means that premiums for non-compliant rest, recovery and meal periods must be […]